<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rpcardio</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1819-6446</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2225-3653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20996/1819-6446-2008-4-5-46-52</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">rpcardio-1156</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL STUDIES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF METOPROLOL SUCCINATE IN HIGH DOSES IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE COURSE OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ ВЫСОКИХ ДОЗ МЕТОПРОЛОЛА ПРОЛОНГИРОВАННОГО ДЕЙСТВИЯ ПРИ ЛЕЧЕНИИ ПАЦИЕНТОВ СО СТАБИЛЬНЫМ ТЕЧЕНИЕМ ИШЕМИЧЕСКОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ СЕРДЦА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Толпыгина</surname><given-names>С. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tolpygina</surname><given-names>S. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">stolpygina@gnicpm.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Марцевич</surname><given-names>С. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Martsevich</surname><given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">stolpygina@gnicpm.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Государственный научно-исследовательский центр профилактической медицины Росмедтехнологий, 101990 Москва, Петроверигский пер., 10</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State Research Center of Preventive Medicine of Rosmedtechnology, Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990 Russia</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2008</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>46</fpage><lpage>52</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Tolpygina S.N., Martsevich S.Y., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Толпыгина С.Н., Марцевич С.Ю.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tolpygina S.N., Martsevich S.Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1156">https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1156</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. To compare two initial doses (50 or 100mg/day) ofmetoprolol succinate in control released presentation (Betaloc ZOK, AstraZeneca) for achievement of target level of heart rate (HR) in patients with stable course of ischemic heart disease (IHD).</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>Material and methods. 50 patients (34 men and 16 women, aged 61,3 y.o., in average) with IHD were involved into the open randomized comparative study. IHD duration was from 1 to 22 years (8,3 years in average). 47 patients completed study, 3 patients drop out because of side effects. Previous therapy with β-blockers or other HR reducing drugs was replaced on metoprolol. Patients were randomized in 2 groups (G1 and G2). The initial metoprolol dose was 50 mg in G1 patients and 100 mg - in G2 patients. The dose was enlarged twice if necessary. Study duration was 6 weeks. The change of HR, blood pressure, electrocardiogram parameters was evaluated. Patients filled in Seattle angina questionnaire initially and after 6 weeks treatment. Therapy tolerability was also estimated.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. In 6 weeks of therapy 61% of G1 patients and 87,5% of G2 patients (p&lt;0,01) reached HR target. Dependence of achievement of target HR and dose of metoprolol was observed (r=0,3; p=0,056). Improvement of the HR control was accompanied by reduction of frequency of angina attacks and increase of life quality.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. Metoprolol (Betaloc ZOK) 200 mg/day provides more effective HR control in patients with IHD vs metoprolol 50-100 mg/day and has good tolerability.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. Сравнить возможность достижения целевого уровня частоты сердечных сокращений (ЧСС) при двух способах назначения метопролола сукцината в лекарственной форме с контролируемым высвобождением (Беталок ЗОК, AstraZeneca), отличающихся по начальной дозе препарата (50 или 100 мг), у больных ишемической болезнью сердца (ИБС) со стабильной стенокардией.</p></sec><sec><title>Материал и методы</title><p>Материал и методы. В открытое рандомизированное исследование с параллельными группами сравнения было включено 50 больных ИБС (34 мужчины и 16 женщин) в возрасте от 38 до 83 лет (средний возраст – 61,3 года). Длительность ИБС колебалась от 1 года до 22 лет (в среднем – 8,3 года). Исследование завершили 47 пациентов, 3 больных выбыли из исследования из-за нежелательных явлений. Предшествующую терапию β-блокаторами или иными препаратами, снижающими ЧСС, заменяли приемом метопролола сукцината пролонгированного действия. Больных рандомизировали в 2 группы. У пациентов 1-й группы начальная доза метопролола составила 50 мг, во 2-й группе – 100 мг. При необходимости, дозу увеличивали в 2 раза. Учитывали динамику уровня артериального давления, ЧСС, параметров электрокардиограммы. Перед началом исследования и после его завершения пациенты заполняли Сиэтлский опросник для стенокардии. Также оценивали переносимость терапии.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Целевой уровень ЧСС через 6 недель терапии достигнут у 61%пациентов в группе 1 и 87,5%- в группе 2 (p&lt;0,01). Выявлена зависимость достижения целевого уровня ЧСС от используемой дозы препарата (r=0,3; p=0,056). Улучшение контроля ЧСС сопровождалось снижением частоты приступов стенокардии и повышением качества жизни.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Метопролол (Беталок ЗОК) в дозе 200 мг/сутки обеспечивает более эффективный контроль ЧСС у больных ИБС по сравнению с дозой 50-100 мг при хорошей переносимости лечения.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ишемическая болезнь сердца</kwd><kwd>частота сердечных сокращений</kwd><kwd>метопролола сукцинат</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>: ischemic heart disease</kwd><kwd>heart rate</kwd><kwd>metoprolol succinate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fox K., Garcia M.A., Ardissino D. et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27(11):1341-81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fox K., Garcia M.A., Ardissino D. et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27(11):1341-81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Freemantle N., Cleland J., Young P. et al. beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ 1999;318:1730-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freemantle N., Cleland J., Young P. et al. beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ 1999;318:1730-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA 1982;247(12):1707-14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA 1982;247(12):1707-14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yusuf S., Peto R., Lewis J. et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985;27(5):335-71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yusuf S., Peto R., Lewis J. et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985;27(5):335-71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gibbons R.J., Chatterjee K., Daley J. et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33(7):2092-197.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gibbons R.J., Chatterjee K., Daley J. et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33(7):2092-197.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Viskin S., Kitzis I., Lev E. et al. Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction: from randomized trials to clinical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25(6):1327-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Viskin S., Kitzis I., Lev E. et al. Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction: from randomized trials to clinical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25(6):1327-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herlitz J., Dellborg M., Karlson B.W. et al. Long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction in relation to prescribed dosages of a beta-blocker at hospital discharge. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2000;14(6):589-95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herlitz J., Dellborg M., Karlson B.W. et al. Long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction in relation to prescribed dosages of a beta-blocker at hospital discharge. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2000;14(6):589-95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
