COMPARISON OF ACE INHIBITOR (FOSINOPRIL) AND Β-ADRENOBLOCKER (ATENOLOL) EFFECTS ON AUTONOMIC REGULATION OF THE HEART IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2008-4-1-10-13
Abstract
Aim. To estimate effects of fosinopril and atenolol on autonomic regulation of heart in patients with arterial hypertension (HT) on the basis of spectral characteristics of heart rate variability (HRV).
Material and methods. 49 patients (46±7 y.o.) with untreated or inadequately treated HT without end organ damages and associated clinical conditions were involved in the study. Heart rhythm was registered during passive orthostatic test with spontaneous breath within 10 min for each stage of the test. HRV was estimated by parametrical method based on autoregression model. Frequency power of HRV spectrum (ms2 ) in high-frequency (HF: 0,15-0,4 Hz) and low-frequency (LF: 0,04-0,15 Hz) ranges was calculated as well as the total power of a spectrum (ТР).
Results. Fosinopril and atenolol reduced in blood pressure levels similarly, atenolol as well reduced in heart rate. Fosinopril and atenolol changed power of LF-range in comparable decreasing manner in upright position. Fosinopril therapy resulted in the same changes with power of HF-range. Atenolol increased power of HF-range in horizontal position and had no effect in upright position. There were not dynamic in TP during treatments.
Conclusion. Fosinopril and atenolol have similar effects on the central mechanisms of autonomic heart regulation and HRV, though atenolol effect on sympathetic-parasympathetic balance is more prominent.
About the Authors
A. R. KiselyovRussian Federation
V. I. Gridnev
Russian Federation
O. V. Shevchenko
Russian Federation
O. M. Posnenkova
Russian Federation
A. N. Strunina
Russian Federation
V. A. Schwarz
Russian Federation
Ja. P. Dovgalevsky
Russian Federation
References
1. Парин В.В., Баевский Р.М. Введение в медицинскую кибернетику. М: Медицина; 1966.
2. Баевский Р.М. Кибернетический анализ процессов управления сердечным ритмом. В: Актуальные проблемы физиологии и патологии кровообращения. М.: Медицина; 1976.
3. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res. 1986;59(2):178-93.
4. Malik M., Camm A.J. Components of heart rate variability. What they really mean and what we really measure. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:821-2.
5. Malik M. Heart rate variability. Curr Opin Cardiol 1998;13(1):36-44.
6. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043-65..
7. Whittam A.M., Claytont R.H., Lord S.W., McComb J.M., Murray A. Heart rate and blood pressure variability in normal subjects compared with data from beat-to-beat models developed from de Boer's model of the cardiovascular system. Physiol Meas 2000; 21(2): 305-318.
8. Pagani M., Malliani A. Interpreting oscillations of muscle sympathetic nerve activity and heart rate variability. J of Hipertension 2000; 18(12): 1709-1719.
9. Bernardi L., Passino C., Spadacini G. et al. Arterial baroreceptor as determinants of 0.1 Hz and respiration-related changes in blood pressure and heart rate spectra. In: Frontiers of blood pressure and heart rate analysis. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997. р. 241-225.
10. Stein PK, Bosner MS, Kleiger RE, Conger BM. Heart rate variability: a measure of cardiac autonomic tone. Am Heart J 1994;127:1376-81.
11. Pagani M., Lombardi F., Malliani A. Heart rate variability: disagreement on the markers of sympathetic and parasympathetic activities. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:951-3.
12. Профилактика, диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии. Российские рекомен- дации (второй пересмотр). Кардиоваск тер профилакт 2004; (приложение): 1–20.
13. Преображенский Д.В., Маренич А.В., Романова Н.Е., и др. Микроальбуминурия: диагностическое, клиническое и прогностическое значение (часть первая). Росс кардиол журн 2000;(3):56-9.
14. Huikuri H.V., Niemela M.J., Ojala S. et al. Circadian rhythms of frequency domain measures of heart rate variability in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Effects of arousal and upright posture. Circulation 1994;90(1):121-6.
15. Cajochen C., Pischke J., Aeschbach D. et al. Heart rate dynamics during human sleep. Physiol Behav 1994;55(4):769-74.
16. Sapoznikov D., Luria M.H., Mahler Y., Gotsman M.S. Day vs night ECG and heart rate variability patterns in patients without obvious heart disease. J Electrocardiol 1992;25(3):175-84.
17. Баевский Р.М., Иванов Г.Г., Чирейкин Л.В., и др. Анализ вариабельности сердечного ритма при использовании различных электрокардиографических систем (методические рекомендации). Вестн аритмол 2002;(24):65-86.
Review
For citations:
Kiselyov A.R., Gridnev V.I., Shevchenko O.V., Posnenkova O.M., Strunina A.N., Schwarz V.A., Dovgalevsky J.P. COMPARISON OF ACE INHIBITOR (FOSINOPRIL) AND Β-ADRENOBLOCKER (ATENOLOL) EFFECTS ON AUTONOMIC REGULATION OF THE HEART IN PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2008;4(1):10-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2008-4-1-10-13