CAROTID ARTERY STENTING IN A PATIENT WITH SINUS BRADYCARDIA: CLINICAL CASE
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-3-356-360
Abstract
Syndrome of hemodynamic depression is a frequent complication of the carotid artery endovascular intervention and, as a rule, is transient in nature. This article presents a clinical case of carotid artery stenting in a 63-year-old patient. The specific feature of this patient was the initial sinoatrial node dysfunction as a permanent sinus bradycardia. The examination verified multisite atherosclerosis, including coronary artery stenosis, manifested by the presence of stable angina, without history of myocardial infarction. Therefore, coronary endovascular treatment was firstly performed. Reexamination after coronary blood flow restoration revealed stable sinus bradycardia persistence without any positive or negative changes. According to anamnesis, examination and instrumental diagnostic results, indications for permanent cardiac pacing were not identified. Carotid artery stenting after the necessary preventive measures was successful. The article also considers possible risk factors of significant perioperative bradycardia during carotid angioplasty with stenting and measures preventing cardiac conduction perioperative worsening.
About the Authors
E. S. Bulgakova
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Junior Researcher, Department of Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Obesity,
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990
T. V. Tvorogova
Private Clinic "Family"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Chief Physician,
Textilnaya ul. 16, Moscow Region, Lobnya, 141730
B. A. Rudenko
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Head of Department of Innovative Methods of Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular and Other Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases,
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990
O. M. Drapkina
National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director,
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990
References
1. Mylonas S.N., Moulakakis K.G., Antonopoulos C.N. et al. Carotid artery stenting-induced hemodynamic instability. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(1):48-60. doi: 10.1583/12-4015.1.
2. Harrop J.S., Sharan A.D., Benitez R.P. et al. Prevention of carotid angioplasty-induced bradycardia and hypotension with temporary venous pacemakers. Neurosurgery. 2001;49(4):814-20.
3. Liu J., Yao G.E., Zhou H.D. et al. Prevention of hemodynamic instability in extra-cranial carotid angioplasty and stenting using temporary transvenous cardiac pacemaker. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;65(2):275-9. doi: 10.1007/s12013-012-9429-z.
4. Cayne N.S., Faries P.L., Trocciola S.M. et al. Carotid angioplasty and stent-induced bradycardia and hypotension: impact of prophylactic atropine administration and prior carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(6):956-61. doi: 10,1016/j.jvs.2005.02.038.
5. Gupta R., Abou-Chebl A., Bajzer C.T. et al. Rate, predictors, and consequences of hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 18;47(8):1538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.079.
6. National guidelines for management of patients with brachiocephalic arteries diseases (2013). Available at: www.angiolsurgery.org/Frecommendations/F2013/Frecommendations_brachiocephalic. pdf. Checked by Mar 20, 2018. [Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с заболеваниями брахиоцефальных артерий (2013). Доступно на: www.angiolsurgery.org/Frecommendations/F2013/Frecommendations_brachiocephalic.pdf. Проверено 20.03.2018].
7. Murakami M., Hatano T., Miyakoshi A. et al. Follow-up after undersized dilatation of targeted lesions in carotid artery stenting. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(5):661-7. doi: 10.3109/02688697. 2015.1029430.
8. Qazi U., Obeid T., Arnaoutakis D.J., Arhuidese I. et al. Poststent ballooning is associated with increased periprocedural stroke and death rate in carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(3):616-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.069.
9. Ogata A., Sonobe M., Kato N. et al. Carotid artery stenting without post-stenting balloon dilatation. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(7):517-20. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010873.
10. Kammler J., Blessberger H., Lambert T. et al. In-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of carotid artery stenoses: a long-term follow-up of a single center cohort. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106(7):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1078-1.
11. Hung C.S., Lin M.S., Chen Y.H. et al. Prognostic factors for neurologic outcome in patients with carotid artery stenting. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016;32(2):205-14.
12. Bush R.L., Lin P.H., Bianco C.C. et al. Reevaluation of temporary transvenous cardiac pacemaker usage during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a safe and valuable adjunct. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2004;38(3):229-35. doi: 10.1177/153857440403800306.
13. Csobay-Novák C., Bárány T., Zima E. et al. Role of stent selection in the incidence of persisting hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(1):122-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602814566404.
14. Krutman M., Calderaro D., Casella I.B. et al. Sinus bradycardia persisting for 9 days after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012;99(3):e134-6.
Review
For citations:
Bulgakova E.S., Tvorogova T.V., Rudenko B.A., Drapkina O.M. CAROTID ARTERY STENTING IN A PATIENT WITH SINUS BRADYCARDIA: CLINICAL CASE. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2018;14(3):356-360. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-3-356-360
Views:
674
.jpg)
Email this article 