Hospital Stage of Myocardial Infarction Treatment in 13 Regions of Russian Federation by Results of the International Research

Aim. To describe the characteristics of the patient with MI who is admitted to a hospital and to characterize the main diagnostic and treatment interventions in clinic.

Material and methods. This study is observational and the part of big international project. It includes a representative sample of patients with MI admitted to 16 clinics in 13 regions of Russian Federation (Arkhangelsk region, Belgorod region, Bryansk region, Tver region, Saratov region, Rostov region, Samara region, the Republic of Tatarstan, Perm region, Tyumen region, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous district, Kemerovo region, Altai region). Patients were selected at random from among those experiencing a MI that were alive on the next morning after hospitalization. Enrollment took place from June 2015 to August 2016.

Results. Of 1,128 patients included in the study, 872 were male (77.3%) and 256 females. 21.4% of patients had a previous MI, 8.3% had undergone PCI, and 2.2% CABG. Turning to cardiovascular risk factors, 46.2% of patients smoked prior to hospitalization, 34.6% were obese and 52.1% had a high cholesterol level. Only 40.0% of patients had no contact with the health care system within 12 months before the MI. Every fourth patient (25.1%) had undergone dispensarisation within 12 months before MI, women significantly often than men (33.5% and 22.6%, p<0.001). Initial revascularization was performed in 73.2% of patients, PCI was the initial revascularization attempt in 49.4% of patients, and PCI with stenting in 46.7%.

Conclusion. Patient with a MI in Russian clinics is likely to have had a history of cardiovascular disease, and to have regular contact with the health care system within 12 months before the development of cardiovascular event. We demonstrated the high rates of appropriate MI treatment, without significant gender and age difference (except for thrombolysis), however, there is a reserve for increasing the proportion of patients who are undergoing revascularization.

1. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators: Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2.

2. Kontsevaya A.V., Drapkina O.M., Balanova Y.A., et al. Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases in the Russian Federation in 2016. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2018;14(2):156-66. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-2-156-166.

3. Kontsevaya А.V., Shal'nova S.А., Balanova YU.А. et al. Socio-economic gradients of behavioral risk factors in the Russian population (based on the results of the ESSE-RF study). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention .2015, 14 (4):59-67. (In Russ.) [

4. Andreev EM, Nolte E, Shkolnikov VM, et al. The evolving pattern of avoidable mortality in Russia. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(3):437-46. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg085.

5. Dégano IR, Salomaa V, Veronesi G, et al. Twenty-five-year trends in myocardial infarction attack and mortality rates, and case-fatality, in six European populations. Heart. 2015;101(17):1413-21. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307310.

6. Popovich L, Potapchik E, Shishkin S, et al. Russian Federation. Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(7):1-190, xiii-xiv.

7. Boytsov S.А., Krivonos O.V., Oshhepkovа E.V. et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of activities, the distribution of the reduction in mortality from vascular diseases, according to monitoring data of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia and the register of ACS. Part 1. Menedzher Zdravookhraneniya. 2010;5:19-29. (In Russ.)

8. Kontsevaya A, Sabgaida T, Ivanova A, et al. How has the management of acute coronary syndrome changed in the Russian Federation during the last 10 years? Health Policy. 2017;121(12):1274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.018.

9. Samorodskaya I. V., Barbarash O. L., Kashtalap V. V., Starinskaya M. А. Analysis of death rates from myocardial infarction in the Russian Federation in 2006 and 2015. Russian Cardiology Journal 2017;11(151):22-6. (In Russ.) .

10. Boytsov S.A., Dovgalevsky P.Ya., Gridnev V.I., et al., Comparative analysis of the data of Russian and foreign acute coronary syndrome registries, Kardiologicheskij Vestnik. 2010;5(1):82-6. (In Russ.)

11. Èrlih А.D., Gracianskij N.А. Russian registry of acute coronary syndrome "RECORD-3". Characteristics of patients and treatment before discharge from the hospital. Kardiologiia. 2016;56(4):17-24. (In Russ.).

12. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. and participants of the RECORD registry. Registry of acute coronary syndromes RECORD. Characteristics of patients and results of in hospital treatment. Kardiologiya. 2009;7(8):4-12. (In Russ.).

13. Erlikh A.D., Kharchenko M.S., Barbarash O.L. et al. The degree of adherence of the implementation of the guidelines on acute coronary syndrome in clinical practice in Russian hospitals and outcomes during hospitalization (data of registry RECORD-2). Kardiologiya. 2013;1:14-22. (In Russ.).

14. Semenova Y.V., Zagrebelnyy A.V., Kutishenko N.P., et al. Assessment of Changes in Quality of Prehospital Treatment of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Last Few Years: LIS-1 vs LIS-3 Registries. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2017;13(6):827-34. (In Russ).

15. Mаrtsevich S.Yu., Kutishenko N.P., Sichinаvа D.P. et al. A prospective outpatient registry of patients who underwent acute myocardial infarction (PROFILE-IM): study design and first results. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2018;1:81-6. (In Russ.)

16. Kontsevaya A, Bobrova N, Barbarash O, et al. The management of acute myocardial infarction in the Russian Federation: protocol for a study of patient pathways [version 2; referees: 2 approved. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;2:89. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12478.2.

17. Ehrlikh A. D. Six-month outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome included in the Russian registry RECORD-3 Russian Cardiological Journal. 2017;11(151):8-14 (In Russ.).

18. Martsevich S.Yu., Semenova Yu.V., Kutishenko N.P., et al. LIS-3 Register of the Acute Coronary Syndrome: what has Changed in a "Portrait" of a Patient and Short-Term Outcomes of the Disease Compared to LIS-1 Register. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2017;13(1):63-8. (In Russ).

19. Barbarash O. L. Kashtalap V. V., Bykova I. S. et al. Features of the clinical course and inpatient treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation depending on sex (according to the Russian register of acute coronary syndrome «RECORD-3»). Russian Cardiology Journal. 2017;6(146):122-31. (In Russ.).

20. Kiselev A.R., Popova Y.V., Posnenkova O.M. et al. Implementation of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Russia and clinical factors influencing decision making. Cor et Vasa. 2014;56:e1-e10.

21. Semenova Yu.V., Kutishenko N.P., Zagrebel'nyj А.V., et al. The influence of prehospital adherence of patients to visiting treatment and prophylactic institutions on the long-term outcomes of acute coronary syndrome: a study of LIS-3. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2017;13(3):363-9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2017-13-3-363-369.