Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and the Risk of Lung Cancer – New Scientific Evidences or Another Example of “Pseudo-Evidence” Medicine?
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-6-887-890
Abstract
About the Author
S. Yu. MartsevichRussian Federation
MD, PhD, Professor, Head of Department of Preventive Pharmacotherapy
References
1. Avorn J. Two Centuries of Assessing Drug Risks. New Engl J Med. 2012;367;3:193-7. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1206652.
2. Barter P.J., Caulfield M., Eriksson M. et al. ILLUMINATE Investigators. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2109-22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa 0706628.
3. ISPE. Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practices (GPP). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2008;17:200-8. doi:10.1002/pds.1471.
4. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987;316(23):1429-35. doi:10.1056/NEJM198706043162301.
5. Zannad F., Anker S.D., Byra W.M. et al. COMMANDER HF Investigators. Rivaroxaban in Patients with Heart Failure, Sinus Rhythm, and Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1332-42. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1808848.
6. Martsevich S.Yu., Navasardyan A.R., Zakharova N.A., Lukyanov M.M. New oral anticoagulants: can the results of international controlled studies with these drugs be transferred to Russian patients? Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2015;14(5):48-52 (In Russ.)
7. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2001;358(9287):1033-41. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06178-5.
8. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145-53. doi:10.1056/NEJM200001203420301.
9. Beckett N.S., Peters R., Fletcher A.E. et al. HYVET Study Group.Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1887-98. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0801369.
10. Pfeffer M.A., Braunwald E., Moye L.A. et al. for the SAVE Investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669-77. doi:10.1056 / NEJM199209033271001.
11. Savarese G., Costanzo P., Cleland J. et al. A meta-analysis reporting effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients without heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:131-42. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.011.
12. Hicks M.B., Filion K.B., Yin H. et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and risk of lung cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4209. doi:10.1136/bmj.k4209.
13. ACE inhibitors can increase the risk of cancer. Medicine news. Russian Medical Journal. [cited by Nov 20, 2018]. Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/news/ingibitory-apf-mogut-povysit-risk-vozniknoveniya-raka/. [Ингибиторы АПФ могут повысить риск возникновения рака. Новости медицины. Российский Медицинский Журнал. [цитировано 20.11.2018]. Доступно на: https://www.rmj.ru/news/ingibitory-apf-mogut-povysit-risk-vozniknoveniya-raka/].
14. Ford E.S., Ajani U.A., Croft J.B., et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2388-98. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa053935.
15. Cronin-Fenton D. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and lung cancer. Any extra risk must be balanced against the mortality benefits of ACE use. BMJ. 2018;363:k4337. doi:10.1136/bmj. k4337.
16. Gliklich R.E., Dreyer N.A., Leavy M.B. eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. 3rd ed. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014
17. Danaei G., Tavakkoli M., Herman M.A. Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:250-62. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr301.
18. Center for drug evaluation and research. Application number: 207620Orig1s000. MEDICAL REVIEW(S) [cited by Nov 20, 2018]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/ drugsatfda_docs/nda/2015/207620Orig1s000MedR.pdf.
19. Sipahi I., Debanne S.M., Rowland D.Y. et al. Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):627-36. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70106-6.
20. D’Agostino R.B. Tutorial in biostatistics propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to а non-randomized control group. Statist Med. 1998;17:2265-81.
Review
For citations:
Martsevich S.Yu. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and the Risk of Lung Cancer – New Scientific Evidences or Another Example of “Pseudo-Evidence” Medicine? Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2018;14(6):887-890. https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-6-887-890