Aging Challenges. Perceived Age – a New Predictor of Longevity?

The ageing process is accompanied by the manifestation of many characteristics, so-called biomarkers, which can be quantified and used to assess a patient's health status. One of these signs is the progressive decline of a human's facial look, which is described by the concept of 'perceived age'. Facial aging is the most important parameter of perceived age. However, over the years, researchers have identified risk factors that affect the facial skin, including smoking, systematic consumption of alcoholic beverages, overweight or underweight, environmental conditions, and psychosocial determinants. The influence of psychological state on the appearance and life prognosis is shown. The authors presented data from the international literature on the study of perceived age. The frontiers of using perceived age as a biomarker of aging were Danish scientists who developed the main methodological approaches to determine this indicator. One such methodology used in population studies has been the clinical technique of assessing perceived age through photography. The review presents this methodology in detail, with its advantages and modifications. The authors conclude that the measurement of an individual's perceived age can serve not only as a prognostic indicator,  but also over time can become a   useful marker of the effectiveness of various treatments. Until now perceived age has hardly been studied in population studies, the authors presented data from the works of V.A.  Labunskaya, G.V.  Serikov,  T.A.  Shkurko who develop the direction related to psychology of perceived age  and in their studies use social-psychological approaches of appearance assessment.

1. Ageing in the 21st century: triumph and challenge. [cited 2021 Nov 01]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Ageing%20Report%20Executive%20Sum-mary%20RUSSIAN%20Final%20low%20resolution.pdf (In Russ.)

2. WHO Healthy ageing [cited 2021 Nov 01]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/healthy-ageing.

3. Demographic Yearbook of Russia 2019. Statistical handbook. Moscow: Rosstat; 2019 (In Russ.)

4. Life expectancy in Russia: recovering growth [cited 2021 Nov 01]. Available from: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0621/tema01.php (In Russ.)

5. Shalnova SA, Oganov RG, Deev AD, et al. Comorbidities of ischemic heart disease with other non-communicable diseases in adult population: age and risk factors association. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2015;14(4):44-51 (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1728-8800-2015-4-44-51.

6. Yarnall AJ, Sayer AA, Clegg A, et al. New horizons in multimorbidity in older adults. Age and Ageing. 2017;46(6):882-8. DOI:10.1093/ageing/afx150.

7. Baker GT 3rd, Sprott RL. Biomarkers of aging. Exp Gerontol. 1988;23(4-5):223-39. DOI:10.1016/0531-5565(88)90025-3.

8. Hamczyk MR, Nevado RM, Barettino A, et al. Biological versus chronological aging: JACC focus seminar. JACC. 2020;75(8):919-30. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.062

9. Karasik D, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Kiel DP. Disentangling the genetic determinants of human aging: biological age as an alternative to the use of survival measures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(5):574-87. DOI:10.1093/gerona/60.5.574

10. Mathers JC, Deary IJ, Kuh D, et al. Guidelines for biomarkers of healthy ageing. London: Medical Research Council; 2005.

11. Yoo J, Kim Y, Cho ER, Jee SH. Biological age as a useful index to predict seventeen-year survival and mortality in Koreans. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):1-7. DOI:10.1186/s12877-016-0407-y.

12. Chan MS, Arnold M, Offer A, et al. A biomarker-based biological age in UK Biobank: composition and prediction of mortality and hospital admissions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(7):1295-302. DOI:10.1093/gerona/glab069.

13. Sharman A, Zhumadilov Z. The scientific basis for healthy aging and antiaging process. New York: Mary Ann Liebert; 2011.

14. Shkurko TA, Serikov GV. The effect of the dynamic component of physical appearance on perceived visual presentations of another person’s age. Russian Psychological Journal. 2017;14(3):190-209 (In Russ.) DOI:10.21702/rpj.2017.3.10.

15. Christensen K, Thinggaard M, McGue M, et al. Perceived age as clinically useful biomarker of ageing: cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339:b5262. DOI:10.1136/bmj.b5262.

16. Gunn DA, Rexbye H, Griffiths CE, et al. Why some women look young for their age. PloS One. 2009;4(12):e8021. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0008021.

17. Gunn DA, De Craen AJ, Dick JL, et al. Facial appearance reflects human familial longevity and cardiovascular disease risk in healthy individuals. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(2):145-52. DOI:10.1093/gerona/gls154.

18. Borkan GA, Norris AH. Assessment of biological age using a profile of physical parameters. J Gerontol.1980;35(2):177-184. DOI:10.1093/geronj/35.2.177.

19. Christensen K, Iachina M, Rexbye H, et al. “Looking old for your age”: genetics and mortality. Epidemiology. 2004;15(2):251-2. DOI:10.1097/01.ede.0000112211.11416.a6.

20. Christensen K, Holm NV, Mcgue M, et al. A Danish population-based twin study on general health in the elderly. J Aging Health. 1999;11(1):49-64. DOI:10.1177/089826439901100103.

21. Gunn DA, Larsen LA, Lall JS, et al. Mortality is written on the face. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(1):72-7. DOI:10.1093/gerona/glv090.

22. Geng X, Zhou ZH, Smith-Miles K. Automatic age estimation based on facial aging patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2007;29(12):2234-40. DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70733.

23. Coma M, Valls R, Mas JM, et a. Methods for diagnosing perceived age on the basis of an ensemble of phenotypic features. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:133-7. DOI:10.2147/CCID.S52257.

24. Gupta MA, Gilchrest BA. Psychosocial aspects of aging skin. Dermatol Clin. 2005;23(4):643-8. DOI:10.1016/j.det.2005.05.012.

25. Theoharides TC, Stewart JM, Taracanova A, et al. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016;17(3):287-94. DOI:10.1007/s11154-016-9369-9.

26. Clatici VG, Racoceanu D, Dalle C, et al. Perceived age and life style. The specific contributions of seven factors involved in health and beauty. Maedica (Bucur). 2017;12(3):191-201.

27. Fink B, Grammer K, Matts PJ. Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2006;27(6):433-42. DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.007.

28. Warren R, Gartstein V, Kligman AM, et al. Age, sunlight, and facial skin: a histologic and quantitative study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25(5):751-60. DOI:10.1016/S0190-9622(08)80964-4.

29. Yaar M, Eller MS, Gilchrest BA. Fifty years of skin aging. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2002;7(1):51-8. DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.19636.x.

30. Kligman LH, Kligman AM. The nature of photoaging: its prevention and repair. Photodermatol. 1986;3(4):215-27.

31. Ernster VL, Grady D, Miike R, et al. Facial wrinkling in men and women, by smoking status. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(1):78-82. DOI:10.2105/ajph.85.1.78.

32. Kadunce DP, Burr R, Gress R, et al. Cigarette smoking: risk factor for premature facial wrinkling. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(10):840-4. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-114-10-840.

33. Daniell HW. Smoker's wrinkles: a study in the epidemiology of" crow's feet". Ann Intern Med. 1971;75(6):873-80. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-75-6-873.

34. Model D. Smoker's face: an underrated clinical sign? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;291(6511):1760-2. DOI:10.1136/bmj.291.6511.1760.

35. Kennedy C, Bastiaens MT, Willemze R, et al. Effect of smoking and sun on the aging skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(4):548-54. DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12092.x.

36. Darvin ME, Sterry W, Lademann J, Patzelt A. Alcohol consumption decreases the protection efficiency of the antioxidant network and increases the risk of sunburn in human skin. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2013;26(1):45-51. DOI:10.1159/000343908.

37. Goodman GD, Kaufman J, Day D, et al. Impact of smoking and alcohol use on facial aging in women: results of a large multinational, multiracial, cross-sectional survey. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019;12(8):28-39.

38. Kazakevich N, Moody MN, Landau JM, Goldberg LH. Alcohol and skin disorders: with a focus on psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2011;16(4):5-6.

39. Blazer S, Khankin E, Segev Y, et al. High glucose-induced replicative senescence: point of no return and effect of telomerase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296(1):93-101. DOI:10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00818-5.

40. Dekker P, Maier AB, Van Heemst D, et al. Stress‐induced responses of human skin fibroblasts in vitro reflect human longevity. Aging Cell. 2009;8(5):595-603. DOI:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00506.x.

41. Paul RG, Bailey AJ. Glycation of collagen: the basis of its central role in the late complications of ageing and diabetes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1996;28(12):1297-310. DOI:10.1016/S1357-2725(96)00079-9.

42. Noordam R, Gunn DA, Tomlin CC, et al. High serum glucose levels are associated with a higher perceived age. Age. 2013;35(1):189-95. DOI:110.1007/s11357-011-9339-9.

43. Bulpitt CJ, Markowe HLJ, Shipley MJ. Why do some people look older than they should? Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(911):578-81. DOI:10.1136/pmj.77.911.578.

44. Wildt L, Sir-Petermann T. Oestrogen and age estimations of perimenopausal women. The Lancet. 1999;354(9174):224. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01436-1.

45. Rexbye H, Petersen I, Johansens M, et al. Influence of environmental factors on facial ageing. Age and Ageing. 2006;35(2):110-15. DOI:10.1093/ageing/afj031.

46. Mayes AE, Murray PG, Gunn DA, et al. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with perceived facial age in Chinese women. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15270. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0015270.

47. Hess TM, Auman C, Colcombe SJ, Rahhal TA. The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58(1):3-11. DOI:10.1093/geronb/58.1.P3.

48. Meisner BA. A meta-analysis of positive and negative age stereotype priming effects on behavior among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012;67(1):13-17. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbr062.

49. Gunn DA, Murray PG, Tomlin CC, et al. Perceived age as a biomarker of ageing: a clinical methodology. Biogerontology. 2008;9(5):357-64. DOI:10.1007/s10522-008-9141-y.

50. Nielsen BR, Linneberg A, Christensen K, et al. The Influence of Clinical Experience and Photographic Presentation on Age Assessment of Women. Gerontology. 2016;62(2):191-9. DOI:10.1159/000438825.

51. Labunskaya VA, Serikov GV. Theoretical foundations and methodological approaches to the study of the phenomenon the "value of appearance". Social Psychology and Society. 2018;9(3):91-103 (In Russ.) DOI:10.17759/sps.2018090310.

52. Labunskaya VA, Drozdova II. A theoretical and empirical analysis of the influence of socio-psychological factors on young people’s assessment and self-assessment of appearance. Russian Psychological Journal. 2017;14(2):202-26 (In Russ.) DOI:10.21702/rpj.2017.2.12.

53. Merinville E, Grennan GZ, Gillbro JM, et al. Influence of facial skin ageing characteristics on the perceived age in a Russian female population. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2015;37 suppl 1:3-8. DOI:10.1111/ics.12252.