Preview

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology

Advanced search

Multivessel coronary artery stenting complicated by stent thrombosis in the setting of hereditary thrombophilia: a clinical case

https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2024-3070

EDN: UDPPSP

Abstract

An urgent issue remains to determine the role and significance of gene polymorphism encoding components of the blood coagulation and anticoagulation system in increasing the risk of myocardial infarction and its thrombotic complications, including those associated with coronary artery stenting. This article presents a clinical case of a patient with multivessel coronary artery disease and hereditary thrombophilia — polymorphism of thrombophilia genes (heterozygote F13, ITGA2). This condition was accompanied by dramatic progression of recurrent stent thrombosis and recurrent myocardial infarction, despite ongoing triple and subsequently dual antithrombotic therapy. Repeated thrombosis necessitated surgical revascularization via coronary artery bypass surgery. Hereditary thrombophilic conditions may contribute to the multifactorial nature of stent thrombosis development, complicating both the diagnosis of its causes and the choice of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy options, especially given the limited time frame in cases of acute stent thrombosis. Risk factors for stent thrombosis in this clinical case include hereditary thrombophilia, multivessel coronary artery disease involving the left main coronary artery, multiple stent implantation, myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization. A number of gene mutations associated with an increased risk of thrombosis were identified, which may have varying clinical significance. However, from the perspective of genetic polymorphism, it is not possible to completely rule out their influence. Regarding the choice of antithrombotic therapy in patients with congenital thrombophilia, recurrent or treatment-resistant thromboses of unknown etiology, rare blood clots localization, randomized clinical trials on the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants remain insufficient. Therefore, warfarin remains the treatment of choice for this specific group group of patients. Diagnosis of hereditary thrombophilic conditions influences the choice of rational therapy and secondary prevention of thrombotic complications.

About the Authors

Z. M. Safiullina
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

Zemfira M. Safiullina

Tyumen



E. M. Mezhonov
Tyumen State Medical University; Regional clinical hospital №1
Russian Federation

Evgeny M. Mezhonov

Tyumen



S. V. Viatchinina
Regional clinical hospital №1
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Viatchinina

Tyumen



Yu. A. Vyalkina
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Vyalkina

Tyumen



A. Kh. Sereshcheva
Regional clinical hospital №1
Russian Federation

Alevtina Kh. Sereshcheva

Tyumen



References

1. Ponomarenko IV, Sukmanova IA. Thrombosis risk factors and gene mutations in young age patients with acute coronary syndrome. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(1S):19-24. (In Russ.) DOI:10.18087/cardio.2602.

2. Shushanova AS, Gladkikh NN, Yagoda AV. Myocardial infarction type 1 at young age: contribution of proatherogenic factors and genetic trombophilies. Therapy. 2023;4:30-7. (In Russ.) DOI:10.18565/therapy.2023.4.30-37.

3. Kiseleva MA, Bolgova MYu. Thrombophilia as a cause of non-atherogenic myocardial infarction. Eurasian Heart Journal. 2019;(S2):210. (In Russ.)

4. Korotaeva ES, Koroleva LYu, Kovaleva GV, et al. Major predictors of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome following transcutaneous coronary intervention who received different double antiplatelet therapy. Kardiologiia. 2018;58(S1):12-21. (In Russ.) DOI:10.18087/cardio.2423.

5. Sohail M, Patel P, Midha S, et al. Identifying the Incidence, Predictors, Outcomes, and Prevention of Stent Thrombosis (ST) in Post-percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Patients With Drug-Eluting Stents (DES): A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45150. DOI:10.7759/cureus.45150.

6. Korotaeva ES, Koroleva LYu, Nosov VP, et al. Major risk factors of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019;12(4):329-35. (In Russ.) DOI:10.17116/kardio201912041329.

7. Chi G, AlKhalfan F, Lee JJ, et al. Factors associated with early, late, and very late stent thrombosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary stent placement: analysis from the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;10:1269011. DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1269011.

8. Tada T, Byrne RA, Simunovic I, et al. Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(12):1267-74. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.015.

9. Raber L, Magro M, Stefanini GG, et al. Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study. Circulation. 2012;125(9):1110-21. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058560.

10. Monassier JP, Hamon M, Elias J, et al. Early versus late coronary stenting following acute myocardial infarction: results of the STENTIM I Study (French Registry of Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;42(3):243-8. DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199711)42:3<243::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-c.

11. Shumakov DV, Shekhyan GG, Zybin DI, et al. Late complications of percutaneous coronary interventions. RMJ. 2020;28(10):25-8. (In Russ.)

12. Ge L, Airoldi F, Iakovou I, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(4):613-20. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.032.

13. Gitel’zon DG, Faibushevich AG, Gitel’zon EA, et al. Recurrent coronary stent thrombosis. Clinical physiology of circulation. 2022;19(3):197-200. (In Russ.) DOI:10.24022/1814-6910-2022-19-3-197-200.

14. Santos-Pardo I, Andersson Franko M, Lagerqvist B, et al. Glycemic Control and Coronary Stent Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(3):260-72. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.012.

15. Korotaeva ES, Koroleva LY, Nosov VP, et al. Multifactorial Prognostication of the Development of Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on the background of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy. Kardiologiia. 2019;59(11):5-13. (In Russ.) DOI:10.18087/cardio.2019.11.n343.

16. Zavalloni D, Presbitero P, Lodigiani C, et al. Prevalence of inherited thrombophilia in patients with documented stent thrombosis. Circ J. 2012;76(8):1874-9. DOI:10.1253/circj.cj-11-1358.

17. Berezovskaya GA, Klokova ES, Petrishchev NN. Genetic predictors for symptoms recurrenсe in coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. Patologicheskaya Fiziologiya i Eksperimental’naya Terapiya (Pathological physiology and experimental therapy). 2017;61(4):81-6. (In Russ) DOI:10.25557/IGPP.2017.4.8527.

18. Bockeria LA, Merzlyakov VYu, Samuilova DSh, et al. Shunt thrombosis after mini-invasive myocardial revascularization in a patient with occult thrombophilia. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2008;(4):66-8. (In Russ.)

19. Hsu Y-M S, Despotis GJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting in 2 thrombophilic patients with protein S deficiency. A A Case Rep. 2014;2(8):92-4. DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000000005.

20. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:87-165. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.

21. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720-826. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.

22. Vasiliev SA, Vinogradov VL, Smirnov AN, et al. Thrombosis and thrombophilia: classification, diagnosis, treatment, prevention. RMJ. Medical Review. 2013;21(17):896-901. (In Russ.)

23. Akimova NM, Epifanova UV, Levchenko AS, Mayskova EA. Repeated myocardial infarction in a young patient as a manifestation of primary thrombophilia. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2018;8(8):368-9. (In Russ.)

24. Panchenko EP. Is there still room for warfarin after appearance of direct oral anticoagulants? Atherothrombosis. 2022;12(2):32-42. (In Russ.) DOI:10.21518/2307-1109-2022-12-2-32-42.

25. Janczak DT, Mimier MK, McBane RD, et al. Rivaroxaban and apixaban for initial treatment of acute venous thromboembolism of atypical location. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(1):40-7. DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.007.

26. Warkentin TE, Pai M, Linkins LA. Direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of HIT: update of Hamilton experience and literature review. Blood. 2017;130(9):1104-13. DOI:10.1182/blood-2017-04-778993.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Safiullina Z.M., Mezhonov E.M., Viatchinina S.V., Vyalkina Yu.A., Sereshcheva A.Kh. Multivessel coronary artery stenting complicated by stent thrombosis in the setting of hereditary thrombophilia: a clinical case. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2024;20(6):669-678. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2024-3070. EDN: UDPPSP

Views: 180


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-6446 (Print)
ISSN 2225-3653 (Online)