The evolution of evidence-based methods of acute myocardial infarction treatment: is there any reason for optimism in recent years?
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2024-3097
EDN: BBYQXS
Abstract
The article briefly describes the stages of creating the main methods of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and its complications treatment. It is noted that currently existing clinical guidelines (CG) were formed at the end of the first decade of the XXI century; since then there have been no principal changes in the CG due to the lack of fundamentally new approaches to the acute MI treatment, its immediate and long-term outcomes. Compliance with the current CG has significantly reduced hospital mortality in acute MI and improved long-term outcomes. However, today, despite compliance with the CG, the absolute hospital mortality rates for acute MI remain quite high, and the long-term prognosis of patients’ lives is very unfavorable. A number of major randomized clinical trials that ended in 2023-2024 and studied fundamentally new approaches to the treatment of acute MI and its long–term outcomes are analyzed. It is noted that none of these studies gave a positive result. A new study with beta-blockers, which proved its positive effect on the mortality of patients with acute MI in the 80s of the twentieth century, gave negative results. This may indicate that a number of acute MI treatment methods, the effectiveness of which was proven several decades ago, have now lost their significance. It is concluded that despite compliance with modern CG, the residual risk of death after acute MI remains quite high. It is necessary to develop principally new methods of treating this disease.
Keywords
About the Author
S. Yu. MartsevichRussian Federation
Sergey Yu. Martsevich.
Moscow
References
1. Obrastzov WP, Straschesko ND. Zur Kenntnis der Thrombose der Koronararterien des Herzens. Z Klin Med. 1910;71:116-32.
2. Herrick JB. Certain clinical features of sudden obstruction of the coronary arteries. JAMA. 1912;LIX(23):2015-22. DOI:10.1001/jama.1912.04270120001001.
3. Herrick JB. Thrombosis of the coronary arteries. JAMA. 1919;72(6):387-90. doi:10.1001/jama.1919.02610060001001.
4. Lang G. F. Diseases of the circulatory system. With additions by M. S. Vovsi and A. L. Myasnikov. Moscow: Medgiz 1958. (in Russ.)
5. A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA. 1982;247(12):1707-14. DOI:10.1001/jama.1982.03320370021023.
6. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet. 1986;1(8478):397-402.
7. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1988;2(8607):349-60. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(88)92833-4.
8. TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(14):932-6. DOI:10.1056/NEJM198504043121437.
9. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(10):673-9. DOI:10.1056/NEJM199303113281001.
10. Huynh T, Perron S, O’Loughlin J, et al. Comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolytic therapy in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: bayesian hierarchical meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Circulation. 2009;119(24):3101-9. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.793745.
11. GISSI-3: effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’infarto Miocardico. Lancet. 1994;343(8906):1115-22.
12. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moyé LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(10):669-77. DOI:10.1056/NEJM199209033271001.
13. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Lancet. 1993;342(8875):821-8.
14. The TRAndolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) study: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the screened population. The Trace Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73(10):44C-50C. DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(94)90623-8.
15. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al; Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study Investigators. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1309-21. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa030207.
16. Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, et al; COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1607-21. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67660-X.
17. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al; Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 Investigators. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1495-504. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa040583.
18. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Lewis EF, et al; PARADISE-MI Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(20):1845-55. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2104508.
19. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720-826. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
20. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):485-510. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.018. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(11):1039.
21. Zuin M, Rigatelli G, Temporelli P, et al. Trends in acute myocardial infarction mortality in the European Union, 2012-2020. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023;30(16):1758-71. DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwad214.
22. Sawayama Y, Takashima N, Harada A, et al. Incidence and In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report from a Population-Based Registry in Japan. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023;30(10):1407-19. DOI:10.5551/jat.63888.
23. Zuin M, Pinto DS, Nguyen T, et al. Trends in Cardiogenic Shock-Related Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 1999 to 2019. Am J Cardiol. 2023;200:18-25. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.05.026.
24. Thiele H, Ohman EM, de Waha-Thiele S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(32):2671-83. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz363.
25. Nair R, Johnson M, Kravitz K, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Early Recurrent Myocardial Infarction After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(16):e019270. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.019270.
26. Plakht Y, Gilutz H, Shiyovich A. When More Means Less: The Prognosis of Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarctions. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5889. DOI:10.3390/jcm10245889.
27. Martsevich SYu, Afonina OS, Zagrebelny AV, et al. Comparative assessment of long-term survival of patients after primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: a data from the RIMIS registry. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(5):4001 (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4001.
28. Gershlick AH, Khan JN, Kelly DJ, et al. Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10):963-72. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.038.
29. Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al; COMPLETE Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(15):1411-21. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1907775.
30. Böhm F, Mogensen B, Engstrøm T, et al; FULL REVASC Trial Investigators. FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(16):1481-92. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2314149.
31. Biscaglia S, Guiducci V, Escaned J, et al; FIRE Trial Investigators. Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(10):889-898. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2300468.
32. Gibson CM, Kastelein JJP, Phillips AT, et al. Rationale and design of ApoA-I Event Reducing in Ischemic Syndromes II (AEGIS-II): A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the efficacy and safety of CSL112 in subjects after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2021;231:121-7. DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.052.
33. Cotton M, Hawley A. SGLT2 inhibitors; suggested mechanism of actions in supporting post-myocardial infarction patients. Future Cardiol. 2023;19(9):419-22. DOI:10.2217/fca-2023-0066.
34. James S, Erlinge D, Storey RF, et al. Dapagliflozin in Myocardial Infarction without Diabetes or Heart Failure. NEJM Evid. 2024;3(2):EVIDoa2300286. DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2300286.
35. Butler J, Jones WS, Udell JA, et al. Empagliflozin after Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(16):1455-66. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2314051.
36. Granger CB, Pocock SJ, Gersh BJ. The need for new clinical trials of old cardiovascular drugs. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(2):71-2. DOI:10.1038/s41569-022-00819-1.
37. Yndigegn T, Lindahl B, Mars K, et al; REDUCE-AMI Investigators. Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(15):1372-81. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2401479.
38. Steg PG. Routine Beta-Blockers in Secondary Prevention — On Injured Reserve. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(15):1434-36. DOI:10.1056/NEJMe2402731.
39. Barrère-Lemaire S, Vincent A, Jorgensen C, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells for improvement of cardiac function following acute myocardial infarction: a matter of timing. Physiol Rev. 2024;104(2):659-725. DOI:10.1152/physrev.00009.2023.
40. You H, Dong M. Identification of Immuno-Inflammation-Related Biomarkers for Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Bioinformatics. J Inflamm Res. 2023;16:3283-302. DOI:10.2147/JIR.S421196.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Martsevich S.Yu. The evolution of evidence-based methods of acute myocardial infarction treatment: is there any reason for optimism in recent years? Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2024;20(4):444-450. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2024-3097. EDN: BBYQXS