Preview

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology

Advanced search

Physicians’ knowledge of therapy that affecting the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure

https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3129

Abstract

   Aim. To find out physicians’ knowledge and perceptions about the possibilities of using therapy affecting the prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (CHFrEF).

   Material and methods. Data of an anonymous survey of 207 physicians (155 cardiologists, 44 internists, 8 other specialists) who past advanced course of professional training in the spring of 2023. Questionnaire contained questions reflecting physicians’ awareness about treatment for improving the prognosis of patients with CHFrEF.

   Results. The quadruple therapy: sacubitril- valsartan (ARNI)/angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin II receptor blocker + beta-blocker (BB) + mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) + sodium- glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) was named as an optimal treatment for CHFrEF by 63.3 % of doctors (71.6 % of cardiologists and 36.4 % of internists). 80 % of respondents (89 % of cardiologists and 50 % of internists) correctly pointed out the indications for ARNI, 75.4 % (83.9 % of cardiologists and 45.4 % of internists) — for therapy with BB, 71.0 % (80 % of cardiologists and 36.3 % of internists) — for prescribing AMR, and 76.8 % (86.4 % of cardiologists and 43.1 % of internists) — for using SGLT2i. 81.7 % of respondents (89.7 % of cardiologists and 52.3 % of internists) correctly named the target dose of BB, 45.9 % (51 % of cardiologists and 31.8 % of internists) indicated the neuromodulatory dose of AMR, and 74.3 % (83.9 % of cardiologists and 52.3 % of internists) correctly noted the recommended dapagliflozin dose (p < 0,01 for all comparisons between groups of cardiologists and internists). Among the drugs that are most often used in everyday practice to improve the prognosis of symptomatic patients with CHFrEF, respondents named BB (66.2 %), MRA (58.5 %), angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (57 %), ARNI (37.7 %), and SGLT2i (45.4 %). Cardiologists use ARNI (p < 0,01), SGLT2i (p < 0,01), and MRA (p < 0,05) more often than internists.

   Conclusion. Insufficient knowledge of physicians, especially internists, of the key provisions of clinical guidelines for CHFrEF pharmacotherapy can be considered as one of the reasons for suboptimal treatment.

About the Authors

N. B. Perepech
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Nikita B. Perepech

St. Petersburg



I. E. Mikhailova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Irina E. Mikhailova

St. Petersburg



A. V. Tregubov
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Aleksey V. Tregubov

St. Petersburg



References

1. Tromp J, Ouwerkerk W, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of pharmacological treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2022;10(2):73-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.09.004.

2. Komajda M, Cowie MR, Tavazzi L, et al; QUALIFY Investigators. Physicians’ guideline adherence is associated with better prognosis in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the QUALIFY international registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(11):1414-23. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.887.

3. Greene SJ, Tan X, Yeh YC, et al. Factors associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27(3):741-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-021-10077-x.

4. Malgie J, Clephas PRD, Brunner-La Rocca HP, et al. Guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF: sequencing strategies and barriers for life-saving drug therapy. Heart Fail Rev. 2023;28(5):1221-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-023-10325-2.

5. Perepech NB, Tregubov AV, Mikhailova IE. Analysis of factors influencing doctors’ awareness of clinical guidelines for heart failure treatment. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024;29(1S):5722 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5722.

6. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083.

7. Authors/Task Force Members:; McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24(1):4-131. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2333.

8. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al.; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardio logy/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guide lines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895-e1032. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063.

9. Fauvel C, Bonnet G, Mullens W, et al. Sequencing and titrating approach of therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines: an international cardiology survey. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023;25(2):213-22. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2743.

10. Ferrannini G, Biber ME, Abdi S, et al. The management of heart failure in Sweden — the physician’s perspective: a survey. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1385281. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1385281.

11. Pierce JB, Vaduganathan M, Fonarow GC, et al. Contemporary use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy among patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the US: the Get With The Guidelines- Heart Failure registry. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8(7):652-61. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1266.

12. Malgie J, Wilde MI, Clephas PRD, et al. Contemporary guideline- directed medical therapy in de novo, chronic, and worsening heart failure patients: First data from the TITRATE-HF study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(7):1549-60. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3267.

13. Shlyakhto EV, Belenkov YuN, Boytsov SA, et al. Interim analysis of a prospective observational multicenter registry study of patients with chronic heart failure in the Russian Federation "PRIORITET-CHF": initial characteristics and treatment of the first included patients. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2023;28(10):5593 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5593.

14. Moghaddam N, Hawkins NM, McKelvie R, et al. Patient Eligibility for Established and Novel Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies After Acute Heart Failure Hospitalization. JACC Heart Fail. 2023;11(5):596-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.013.

15. Stolfo D, Lund LH, Benson L, et al. Real-world use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023;25(9):1648–58. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2971.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Perepech N.B., Mikhailova I.E., Tregubov A.V. Physicians’ knowledge of therapy that affecting the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2025;21(1):14-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3129

Views: 308


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-6446 (Print)
ISSN 2225-3653 (Online)