Preview

Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology

Advanced search

Carriage of CYP2C19 gene alleles and possible drug-drug interactions in patients with coronary artery disease

https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3213

Abstract

Aim. To analyse the frequencies of the CYP2C19 gene alleles and genotypes associated with the metabolism of antiplatelet agents in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), considering potential drug-drug interactions in real clinical practice in Arkhangelsk.

Material and methods. The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Emergency Cardiology Department of the Regional Vascular Center of the E.E. Volosevich First City Clinical Hospital in Arkhangelsk. The study included 96 patients diagnosed with CAD (I20.0-I22.0 according to ICD-10). Patients were divided into two groups: those hospitalized for the first time and those readmitted. All patients underwent pharmacogenetic testing of polymorphic variants of the CYP2C19 gene. Genotyping of polymorphic variants of the CYP2C19 gene was performed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in real time. The analysis of allelic variants rs28399504, rs4244285, rs4986893 of the CYP2C19 gene was performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch amplifier using the SNP-Screen kits (Synthol LLC, RF).

Results. The study included 96 patients with CAD aged 39 to 100 years. The patients were divided into two groups: primarily hospitalised and patients readmitted for recurrent acute coronary syndrome. The groups were comparable in sex and age. Significant differences were observed for INR: 1.05 [1.00; 1.14] in the first group and 1.08 [1.03; 1.14] in the second group (p=0.04), as well as for treatment outcome – 4 fatal cases (10%) were noted in the second group, while all patients in the first group were discharged (p=0.016). In both groups, carriers of low-functional CYP2C19 variants (G681A, G636A), classified as intermediate or poor metabolisers, were identified in both groups, which may be significant for drug-drug interactions in CAD pharmacotherapy in clinical practice. The A1G variant was identified only in the first group (3,6% (n=2)). No statistically significant difference was found in the frequency of loss-of-function alleles between the groups or in the

frequency of readmissions during antiplatelet therapy. Analysis of therapy in patients carrying pathological alleles revealed potentially adverse drug-drug interactions, e.g., clopidogrel and omeprazole, manifested as reduced clopidogrel efficacy and an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Conclusion. This study did not reveal a statistically significant association between the presence of mutant CYP2C19 gene alleles and the frequency of readmissions, but emphasized the importance of a comprehensive personalized approach to pharmacotherapy in CAD patients. Consideration of pharmacogenetic, clinical, and pharmacological factors may contribute to therapy optimization and improvement of CAD treatment outcomes. Further studies with larger samples (including population-based studies) are required for definitive conclusions.

About the Authors

N. A. Vorobyeva
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Nadezda A. Vorobyeva

Arkhangelsk



D. D. Komissarova
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dariya D. Komissarova

Arkhangelsk



A. S. Vorontsova
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Aleksandra S. Vorontsova

Arkhangelsk



P. A. Vetoshkina
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation

Polina A. Vetoshkina

Arkhangelsk



References

1. Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(13):256. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.06.33.

2. Khan M, Hashim M, Mustafa H, et al. Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9349. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9349.

3. Vorob’eva NM, Karpov JuA. Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy is a new opportunity to improve the prognosis in patients after myocardial infarction Atmosfera. Novosti kardiologii. 2017;4(1):2-10. (In Russ.).

4. Severino P, D’Amato A, Pucci M, et al. Ischemic Heart Disease Pathophysiology Paradigms Overview: From Plaque Activation to Microvascular Dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(21):8118. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218118.

5. Amlaev KR, Khripunova AA, Maksimenko LL, et al. The pharmacogenetics as integral part of personalized medicine: problems and prospects. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2024;32(2):173-9. (In Russ.)

6. Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138(1):103-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007.

7. Lee CR, Luzum JA, Sangkuhl K, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2022 Update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;112(5):959-67. DOI:10.1002/cpt.2526.

8. Kantemirova BI, Abdullaev MA, Chernysheva EN, et al. Comparative study of the CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP4F2 gene polymorphisms impact on the clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute coronary syndrome patients. Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics. 2023;(1):46-55. (In Russ.)

9. Sychev DA, Shprakh VV, Kitaeva EYu, Mirzaev KB. Polymorphism of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genes associated with changes in the activity of clopidogrel in patients with ischemic stroke: clinical and ethnic aspects. Clinical pharmacology and therapy 2019;28(3):79-84. (In Russ.)

10. Sychev DA, Zyatenkov AV, Kukes BG. Clinical pharmacogenetics of antiaggregants: clinical pharmacologist’ point of view. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2007;(4):91-9. (In Russ.).

11. Karalkin PA, Belyakov IS, Parshina OV, et al. Experience of implementing pharmacogenetic testing for CYP2C19 for personalize application of antiplatelet agents in patients with cardiovascular diseases in a multidisciplinary hospital. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics. 2015;2(1):24-9 (In Russ.).

12. Kenngott S, Olze R, Kollmer M, et al. Clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) interaction: separate intake and a non-omeprazole PPI the solution? Eur J Med Res. 2010;15(5):220-4. DOI: 10.1186/2047-783X-15-5-220.

13. Juurlink DN, Gomes T, Ko DT, et al. A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel. CMAJ. 2009;180(7):713-8. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.082001.

14. Semashchenko KS, Mongush TS, Kosinova AA, et al. Study the Association of Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Platelet Receptor and Cytochrome P450 Genes with the Development of Resistance to Antiplatelet Drugs in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology 2022;18(3):289-96. (In Russ.).

15. Loginova IYu, Kurguzov AV, Isaev AS, et al. Association of GUCY1A3 (rs7692387), CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285), CYP2C19*3 (rs4986893) gene polymorphism with antiplatelet drug metabolism and prognosis of cardiovascular complications: a systematic review. Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery 2024;28(4):7-17. (In Russ.).

16. Shatalova NA, Sychev DA, Mirzoev KB, et al. Pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2023;19(5):470-8. (In Russ.).

17.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Vorobyeva N.A., Komissarova D.D., Vorontsova A.S., Vetoshkina P.A. Carriage of CYP2C19 gene alleles and possible drug-drug interactions in patients with coronary artery disease. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2025;21(6):585-591. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3213

Views: 61

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1819-6446 (Print)
ISSN 2225-3653 (Online)