Antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalised with myocardial infarction in 2016-2023: timeliness of clinical guideline adherence
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3169
EDN: YCPPDW
Abstract
Aim. To analyse the dynamics of prescribing triple antithrombotic therapy (TATT) at discharge (TATT: oral anticoagulant (OAC) + two antiplatelet agents) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute myocardial infarction (MI) between 2016-2023, as well as the alignment of clinical practice with the clinical guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC).
Material and methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 813 patients with AF and acute MI, divided into four groups based on hospitalisation period: 2016-2017 (n=104), 2018-2019 (n=256), 2020-2021 (n=239), 2022-2023 (n=214). The frequency and composition of ATT prescriptions were assessed, along with their compliance with current guidelines. Due to the absence of RSC guidelines before 2020, ATT compliance was assessed against the 2015 ESC guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), the 2017 ESC guidelines for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and the 2016 ESC guidelines for AF. After 2020, compliance was evaluated against the 2020 RSC guidelines for the same conditions.
Results. Among patients not undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), OAC + antiplatelet therapy was prescribed to 10.2% in 2016-2017 and 13.5% in 2018–2019, aligning with the 2016 ESC guidelines for AF. Among PCI-treated patients, TATT was prescribed in 9.1% of cases in 2016-2017 and 51.0% in 2018-2019, consistent with ESC guidelines. In non-PCI patients, the correct OAC + antiplatelet combination was prescribed to 17.2% in 2020-2021 and 27.5% in 2022-2023. TATT at discharge was prescribed to 48.7% of PCI-treated NSTE-ACS patients in 2020-2021 and 72.5% in 2022-2023, aligning with the 2020 RSC guidelines for NSTE-ACS. The combination of OAC + antiplatelet therapy for PCI-treated STEMI patients was prescribed in 13.3% of cases in 2020-2021 and 8.6% in 2022-2023, consistent with the 2020 RSC guidelines for STEMI. Overall, OAC use increased from 16.3% in 2016-2017 to 87.9% in 2022-2023.
Conclusion. The study demonstrates significant progress in OAC and TATT prescription. However, a gap remains between clinical practice and guidelines, particularly in the composition of combination therapy at discharge.
About the Authors
K. G. PereverzevaRussian Federation
Kristina G. Pereverzeva
Ryazan
S. S. Yakushin
Russian Federation
Sergey S. Yakushin
Ryazan
N. A. Kindyakova
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Kindyakova
Ryazan
P. R. Mamedov
Russian Federation
Polad R. Mamedov
Ryazan
References
1. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. Population prevalence, incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart 2001;86(5):516- 21. DOI:10.1136/heart.86.5.516.
2. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2020;42(5):373-498. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):507. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa798. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):546-547. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa945. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2021;42(40):4194. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab648.
3. Violi F, Soliman EZ, Pignatelli P, et al. Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Pathophysiologic Mechanisms. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(5):e003347. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.116.003347.
4. Shishkina E., Khlynova OV, Lebedeva YuI, et al. Atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction: clinical and pathogenetic relationships and impact on prognosis. Doctor.Ru. 2023;22(8):23-8. (In Russ.) DOI:10.31550/1727-2378-2023-22-8-23-28.
5. Parshikova EN, Filippov EV. All-cause mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction depending on the type of reperfusion therapy. Russian Medical and Biological Bulletin Named After Academician I.P. Pavlov. 2020;28(4):479-87. (In Russ.) DOI:10.23888/PAVLOVJ2020284479-487.
6. ACTIVE Writing Group of the ACTIVE Investigators; Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Hart RG, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9526):1903- 12. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68845-4.
7. Pereverzeva KG, Yakushin SS, Pripadcheva AE, Agaltsova NP. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation after myocardial infarction: clinical guidelines and real-world practice. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2018;14(6):858- 63. (In Russ.) DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-6-858-863.
8. Pereverzeva KG, Yakushin SS, Ezhova AV, et al. Dynamics of antithrombotic therapy prescribing in patients with atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction in 2016–2019. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(7):3908. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3908.
9. Korshikova AA, Pereverzeva KG, Yakushin SS. Dynamics of antithrombotic therapy prescribing in patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for myocardial infarction in 2016-2021. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald 2023;31(3):405-14. (In Russ.) DOI:10.17816/PAVLOVJ109417.
10. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;(7):7-86. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-7-7-86.
11. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2016;(3):9-63. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2016-3-9-63.
12. The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society Of Cardiology (ESC). 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;(5):103-58. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2018-5-103-158.
13. Arakelyan MG, Bokeria LA, Vasilieva EYu, et al. Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. 2020 Clinical guidelines. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(7):4594. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4594.
14. Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. 2020 Clinical guidelines. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4103. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4103.
15. Barbarash OL, Dupyakov DV, Zateischikov DA, et al. Acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. 2020 Clinical guidelines. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(4):4449. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4449.
16. Lip GYH, Collet JP, Haude M, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group, et al. 2018 Joint European consensus document on the management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA). Europace. 2019;21(2):192-3. DOI:10.1093/europace/euy174.
17. Perepech NB, Mikhailova IE, Tregubov AV. Physicians’ adherence to recommendations on the use of oral anticoagulants. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2020;16(5):706-12. (In Russ.) DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2020-10.
18. Lobastov KV, Navasardyan AR, Schastlivtsev IV. Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in real clinical practice according to a survey of physicians. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2021;17(3):376-85. (In Russ.) DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2021-06-01.
19. Averkov OV, Harutyunyan GK, Duplyakov DV, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation electrocardiogram. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(3):6306. (In Russ.) DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6306.
20. Averkov OV, Harutyunyan GK, Duplyakov DV, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation electrocardiogram. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2025;30(5):6319. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6319.
21. Wang T, Tan JB, Liu XL, Zhao I. Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e062158. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062158.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Pereverzeva K.G., Yakushin S.S., Kindyakova N.A., Mamedov P.R. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalised with myocardial infarction in 2016-2023: timeliness of clinical guideline adherence. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2025;21(3):217-225. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2025-3169. EDN: YCPPDW